Via Katfriend Darren Meale comes the news that, together with Royal
Bank of Scotland’s IP Legal Counsel Mark
Cruickshank, he is organising a roundtable on Brexit specifically
focused on brand owners in the financial services industry.
Here's
the relevant flyer:
Br*x*t and brands – would you like to join the Financial
Services Roundtable?
With answers to questions such as “what is going on?” and
“when it is going to happen?” hard to come by when it comes to Brexit, brand
owners might want to start being more proactive with engaging with the
government in the hope of understanding what their IP rights will look like
once the UK leaves the EU.
To that end, Darren Meale (IP partner at Simmons & Simmons) and Royal
Bank of Scotland’s IP Legal Counsel, Mark
Cruickshank, are putting together a “Brexit and Brands Roundtable” for brand
owners in the Financial Services industry. The group will comprise trade
mark/intellectual property lawyers from a number of major banks and financial
institutions. The role of the group will be to liaise with the UK authorities
and the wider IP industry to look at trade mark and other IP issues raised by
Brexit, which has the potential to significantly impact on the IP owned by
those businesses. A first meeting of the group with representatives from the UK
Intellectual Property Office is due to take place in September.
The Roundtable already features a number of big names but
there is room for more members. If you are an IP lawyer at a financial
institution and would like to join in, Darren would love to hear from you
at darren.meale@simmons-simmons. com. To give
the group focus, membership is currently limited to financial services brand
owners, but brand owners from other industries keen to find out more can also
drop Darren a line.
Brexit roundtable for brand owners in the financial services industry
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Friday, July 28, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html