GCC diplomatic crisis update: Qatar’s new request for consultation with Saudi to address IP violations
Further to a series of posts [here, here, here, here] devoted
to the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) crisis, Katfriend Riyadh Al-Balushi (PhD
candidate at SOAS University of London) is back with an update on the latest developments.
Here’s what Riyadh writes:
The GCC diplomatic crisis has not been
resolved until now as the blockade imposed last year by Saudi, the UAE, and
Bahrain on Qatar remains effective with no prospect of a solution anywhere in
sight. As I have written before, this blockade has implications on a variety of
intellectual property issues, with the
piracy of beIN Sports being one of the most prominent examples of the extent of
damage that this dispute may cause.
Qatar made an attempt at using the WTO
dispute resolution mechanism to seek a remedy to address a variety of alleged
violations committed by Saudi, the UAE, and Bahrain. These alleged violations
include a number of violations of the TRIPS Agreement. In accordance with the
WTO dispute resolution mechanism - the DSU (Dispute Settlement Understanding),
Qatar made formal requests for consultation with Saudi, Bahrain, and the UAE in
July 2017. It escalated its complaint against the UAE by requesting that a dispute
resolution panel is established to examine the complaint in October 2017.
Early this month, Qatar made a new request
for consultation with Saudi specifically to complain about the alleged
violations of the intellectual property rights of Qataris in Saudi. The
previous request for consultation from 2017 was a general complaint about the
Saudi attempts at ‘the economic isolation of Qatar’, the complaint did not
concern a specific incident, and it covered alleged violations of both the GATT
and the TRIPS Agreement. There is no public record of Saudi responding to
Qatar’s request for consultation from 2017 and this complaint did not progress
to a panel stage until now.
The new request for consultation that
Qatar submitted on 4 October 2018 is a more specific complaint about Saudi’s
alleged failure to provide adequate protection to the intellectual property
rights of Qataris with a specific focus on the Saudi measures that impacted
beIN Sports. I have written a two-part series (Part 1, Part 2) on how beIN
Sports got caught in the crossfire of the GCC diplomatic crisis. Saudi banned
beIN Sports from being broadcast or offered in the country, and has allowed a
pirate network called beoutQ to operate in Saudi as an illegal alternative to
beIN Sports. According to the complaint submitted by Qatar, beoutQ is transmitted
via the satellites of Arabsat - the Saudi-based Arab Satellite Communications
Organisation. Qatar also claims that beoutQ is “an entity” that is based in
Saudi.
Qatar’s complaint against Saudi in 2017
was based on shaky intellectual property legal basis as it argued that Saudi
has made it impossible for Qataris to honour their licensing obligations or use
their intellectual property rights in a way that violates the national
treatment and most-favoured-nation treatment principles. The new complaint from
2018 is based on more sophisticated arguments about the alleged failure of
Saudi to protect the intellectual property rights of Qataris and the
obstacles that Saudi has put in place to deprive Qataris of their right to
protect their intellectual property rights in Saudi. The new complaint alleges
the violation of Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement (national treatment
principle), Article 4 (most-favoured-nation treatment principle), Article 9
(Compliance with Articles 1-21 of the Berne Convention), Article 14.3
(Protection of broadcasting organisations rights), Article 16.1 (Protection of
trademarks), Article 41.1 (ensuring that enforcement procedures are available
to permit effective action against any act of infringement), Article 42 (fair
and equitable procedures - members must make available civil judicial
procedures for enforcement of IP rights), and Article 61 (providing criminal
procedures and penalties in cases of wilful trademark counterfeiting and
copyright piracy on a commercial scale).
A detailed analysis of this complaint will
be undertaken by a WTO panel only if Qatar makes a request to establish a panel
after its attempt for consultation with Saudi fails. Qatar has already made a
request to establish a panel to examine its complaint against the UAE in
October 2017 and the panel for this complaint was composed in September 2018.
The complaint against the UAE shares some similar legal arguments to that
against Saudi since Qataris are also banned from entering the UAE and are
unable to take advantage of the Emirati legal system to enforce their
intellectual property rights.
I will be sharing more updates as this
dispute progresses.
GCC diplomatic crisis update: Qatar’s new request for consultation with Saudi to address IP violations
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Tuesday, October 09, 2018
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html