Don't worry if you missed out on any IPKat news last week - this Kat got you covered...
Can't miss anything... |
PATENTS
One important consideration in any
legal system is the competency of appeal departments to review findings of fact
at first instance. The case law of the Boards of Appeal has historically
permitted only limited reassessment of facts at the appeal stage. However, a
recent EPO Board of Appeal decision has now taken a differing approach to
preceding Boards of Appeal on this issue. The Board of Appeal found that Boards
are broadly competent to reassess findings of fact by a first instance
department. The decision thus has potentially important consequences for what
aspects of an Examining or Opposition Division decision may be challenged by an
appellant. Rose
Hughes reported on the decision.
TRADE MARKS
How far does likelihood of confusion
go, within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 (the EU Trade
Mark Regulation (EUTMR), when it comes to the comparison between two signs? In
an interesting decision from last month, the General Court considered that -
despite the generally high level of attention of the target public for the
Class 5 goods – the figurative sign of Almea Ltd was confusingly similar to the
German word mark ‘MEA’. Nedim
Malovic reported on the case.
COPYRIGHT
The Intellectual Property Enterprise
Court (IPEC) has handed down judgment in the retrial of a dispute concerning
the authorship of the screenplay of the film Florence
Foster Jenkins, starring Meryl Streep and Hugh Grant. Katfriend Daniela
Simone reported on this joint ownership case.
OTHER IP TOPICS: ROYALTY DISTRIBUTION,
PODCASTS
Must collective management
organisations distribute royalties only to members whose works were used? This
is essentially the question that the Federal High Court of Nigeria was asked in
the case of Green
Light Music Publishing Limited and Others v Copyright Society of Nigeria
Ltd/Gte decided late last year. Chijioke
Okorie reported on the case.
Are podcasts to the rescue of print
journalism under siege? One of the struggles of print journalism is how to
attract paid subscribers. One of the most interesting recent attempts to do so
has been to try and establish a notable presence in a different medium and
then to leverage that position to facilitate increased paid subscriptions in
the original print product. Neil
Wilkof has been particularly struck by the efforts of print icons to
gain a foothold in the podcast space for that purpose, and reported on these
efforts.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html