Continuing this Kats serendipitous journey of reviewing books on copyright exceptions, she comes to the last, but by no means least, of its kind in her pile: The Cambridge Handbook of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions, edited by Shyamkrishna Balganesh (Columbia Law School), Ng-Loy Wee Loon (National University of Singapore) and Haochen Sun (University of Hong Kong).
This edited collection provides a stellar list of contributors, many of whom have been included in this Kats recent book review saga, such as Aplin and Bently, Emily Hudson and other leading authors, making this handbook the first to bring together comparative reflection of copyright limitations and exceptions.
The book is presented in 22 chapters, organised into 5 parts, which reflect the 5 principle themes presented by the volume. This is something that immediately sets this handbook apart from many others that this Kat has had the pleasure of reading - whilst it is a handbook covering a range of ideas, there is clear narrative that makes you want to read it cover to cover, rather than what we more commonly do with handbooks, which is to take a more a la carte approach to chapters of interest.
Whilst the volume has consciously refrained from framing discussions in the traditional 'comparative law' mold, it has nevertheless attempted to be exhaustive in its topical and methodological coverage, in the abiding hope that the comparative discussion of copyright limitations and exceptions will become a mainstay of intellectual property conversations and debates in the years to come.That said, it would be a disservice to attempt to detail to readers the content of every chapter, so instead I will give you an overview of each part, picking chapters from each section to wet your appetite!
Part I: The Theoretical Foundation of Copyright Limitations
Part 1 of the book consists of two chapters. The first chapter by Ben Depoorter considers the economics of copyright exemptions, followed by Christopher S. Yoo’s chapter looks at the theory of self-actualization.
Part II: Internationalizing Copyright Exceptions
Part III: Models of Copyright Exceptions
Parts 3 and 4 are the most substantial of the book. Part 3 is on a mission to detail the real landscape of copyright exceptions across the globe, doing away with the over simplified categories of ‘fair use’ and ‘fair dealing’ systems.
Part IV: Obvious and Hidden Values in the Working of Copyright Exceptions
Part 4, provides 8 chapters looking into specific values that operate within copyright law. The editors organise these values into two categories, 1) obvious – including educational uses, parody and news, and 2) hidden or implicit – cultural uses and the idea of an overarching concern for the public interest.
Although authors of religious music and songs compose for the glory of God, this does not mean that these authors should find their reward only in Heaven.
Hungry for more! Image: Devon D'Ewart |
Part V: Copyright Exceptions and Technology
This final part, consists of only one chapter, which is a shame as such an interesting topic could have benefited from further perspectives. Nevertheless, David Nimmer takes on the Part and the Chapter by looking at security measures and the future of US fair use. Nimmer argues that the fourth fair use factor that courts consider, namely; “the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted works”, premises copyright liability on predicting the future, which is further complicated by the development of technology.
Weighing in at 0.966kg, it feels relevant to mention that it is not a small book (dimensions: 254 x 178 x 24 mm) and 419 pages. This book would undoubtedly appeal to anyone interested in copyright exceptions. It provides a truly global discussion on all angles of the dimensions and debates around copyright exceptions and limitations.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Date Published: January 2021
Hardback ISBN: 9781108483049
£160.00
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html