Let's catch up with the IPKat's whereabouts...Time to catch up!
PATENTS
The referral to the Enlarged Board of
Appeal (EBA) in G1/21 relates to the legality of conducting Board of Appeal
oral proceedings by Video Conferencing without the consent of all parties. The
rapidly scheduled public hearing will take place via Zoom next week. The EPO
has now opened registration to watch the live stream. Rose
Hughes reported on the EPO’s response to accusations of perceived bias
in G1/21.
The discussion surrounding the
suspension of IP rights in the COVID-19 vaccines has become increasingly heated
over the past few months and weeks. The IPKat is delighted to host a guest
opinion on the so called ‘TRIPS waiver’ by Prof Daniel Gervais. Read the TRIPS
Waiver Debate here.
Back in February, the Court of Appeal
in IPCom v Vodafone overturned the first instance decision of Mr
Recorder Douglas Campbell QC who held that Vodafone could benefit from what
seems to be the somewhat mythical defence of Crown use. Although the decision is relatively dusty in
the fast-paced age, the decision warrants further review. Read the decision here.
Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v
Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? Rose
Hughes answered the question here.
Last year the IPKat started a series
recapping patent litigation in some of the major patent litigation
jurisdictions in Europe (see reports from the Netherlands, Germany and France).
In this second
roundup of Dutch patent litigation, we dive into some of the noteworthy
patent cases of the Dutch courts from July – December 2020.
COPYRIGHT
Common copyright wisdom holds that
technological developments primarily change the way that contents are
reproduced and distributed. The obvious “then” and “now” are the printing press
and the internet. “Then”, the ability to make multiple copies of contents
created the conditions for the rise of the publishing industry; “now”, the rise
of the internet compresses the timeline, where reproduction and distribution of
digital contents occur simultaneously. Neil
Wilkof provided an insight into how playlists are changing the nature
of musical works.
After
months of discussion, South Africa’s Portfolio Committee on Trade and Industry
reached a formal decision on the President’s reservations in respect of the
Copyright Amendment Bill and the Performers’ Protection Amendment Bill. Chijioke
Okorie reported on South Africa’s National Assembly’s decision to rescind
the pass of the Copyright Amendment Bill.
TRADE MARKS
The anonymous graffiti artist known as
Banksy is no stranger to trade mark wrangling, with this week’s cancellation
decision by the European Union Intellectual Property Office’s Cancellation
Division following hot on the heels of similar proceedings last September,
concerning the work 'Flower Thrower'. Sophie Corke reported on the cancellation
decision here.
The famous musical, "Fiddler on
the Roof", is all about the complexities of tradition. Indeed, there is an
entire song dedicated to it. But tradition can also play a role in trademark
law. Former Guest Kat Peter
Ling has visited the IPKat lair and shares with Kat readers the
potential risk of transferring a registered trademark without the accompanying
goodwill.
OTHER IP TOPICS
The Digital Scholarship Institute is
launching its activities by the publication of “The Aequitas Principles on
Online Due Process”. The Digital Scholarship Institute is focused on
facilitating norm-setting processes in the context of balancing online rights
such as free speech, privacy, and intellectual property. The goal is to
facilitate a broader discussion of these issues in both the private and public
spheres and to help frame the appropriate framework within which these
processes should take place. Merpel
McKitten provided all the details on the Digital Scholarship Institute.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html