Slow and Steady Wins the Race? - Nigeria's Copyright Amendment Bill is finally before the National Assembly
Three years after Nigeria’s Federal Executive Council considered and approved the Copyright (Repeal) Bill, it has now been transmitted to the National Assembly for enactment into law.
Readers following the copyright reform process in Nigeria would recall that following public comments in February 2015, a team of national experts engaged through the Nigerian Copyright Commission revised the Draft Copyright Bill before it was presented to the Federal Executive Council for consideration and approval. [It has been a protracted wait since
then and so there is some relief that the reform process is back on track.]
We wait... |
In terms of timeline, the Copyright (Repeal) Bill still have a ways to go at least time wise. It will need to pass through 3 readings including consideration by a committee before it is signed and passed by the National Assembly and then forwarded to the President for his assent or veto. For guidance on the law-making process in Nigeria, see here.
There is also the challenge of other copyright amendment bills such as the Bill for an Act to repeal the Copyright Act Cap C28 LFN 2004 and to re-Enact the Copyright Act 2021 and for matters connected therewith, 2021 (SB. 688) which has already passed through two readings before the Senate.
Slow and Steady Wins the Race? - Nigeria's Copyright Amendment Bill is finally before the National Assembly
Reviewed by Chijioke Okorie
on
Friday, July 09, 2021
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html