Thanksgiving just gets this Kat all warm and tingly and all kinds of wonderful inside. Let’s see what the other IP blogs have been up to this week:-
Trade Marks
“Metaverse” has become centre stage after
Facebook announced that it had changed its company name to “Meta”. Whilst there are conflicting views as to
whether this technological concept should be taken seriously, it is without a
doubt that metaverse is appearing more frequently in company’s branding
efforts. The Fashion Law recently wrote a post specifically discussing what
the metaverse means for trade mark owners.
The TTABlog reported that USPTO issued its final
regulations under the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 and would likely be
useful to trade mark practitioners who handle client’s US trade mark
portfolios. The TTABlog also reported on
two decisions of the USPTO, one involving an opposition between P.C. Richard
& Son’s registered marks “THE WIZ” and “NOBODY BEATS THE WIZ” and Samsung’s
application for “SAMSUNG WIZ”, and another whereby the USPTO refused the
registration of an application for “MANSBRAND” as it found it to be confusingly
similar to “MANBRAND SKINCARE”.
SpicyIP brought a guest post from Payal Saraogi on a
recent decision of the Delhi High Court on Google’s use of trade marks as
advertisement keywords.
Copyright
With reference to self-driving vehicles,
Professor Daniel Gervais discussed his views concerning copyright
protection for the output of AI machines on Kluwer Copyright Blog.
Patents
Kluwer Patent Blog reported on a recent Danish High Court
(Eastern Division) on a long running patent infringement case. In particular, the decision touched upon the
issue of acquiescence/passivity in patent infringement actions.
Others
Following on its earlier report, Foss Patent provided an update on the Epic Games v Apple
injunction. In response to Apple’s
motion to stay the injunction proceedings, Epic Games has now filed its
opposition brief. It will be interesting
to see how the case progresses.
The IP Draughts noted that it is becoming increasingly popular
to include references to “non-severable improvements” in research contracts and
emphasized that blog’s preference for having such terms defined whenever used
in a contract.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html