Another week, another review of the latest news from the surrounding IP blogs!
TRADE MARKS
The China National Intellectual Administration (CNIPA) recently published the new guidelines for trade mark examination procedures. The new guidelines cover topics such as formality examination and procedures for trade mark applications, oppositions, declarations of invalidity, cancellations, classification of goods and services, examination of applications for change of trade mark ownership, trade mark renewal and other procedural issues. Ling Zhao of the MARQUES China team reports here.
Chanel is seeking to register the number 5 with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for use on cosmetics. The Fashion Law tells the rest of the story.
COPYRIGHT
YouTube has released the first edition of its copyright transparency report. The report, which covers copyright enforcement on the platform from January to June 2021, provides insights into how the platform's copyright management systems are working. Is overblocking real? Paul Keller reports on the Kluwer Copyright Blog.
Recently, comedians and other spoken word writers claim the same streaming royalties as songwriters, but a standoff has resulted in their works being removed from Spotify. Aaron Moss reports for copyrightlately.
Gianluca Campus discusses the balance between cloud services and private copying levy in his analysis of the AG Hogan’s Opinion in the Austro-Mechana case (C-433-20), published for the Kluwer Copyright Blog.
PATENTS
Prof. Dr. Thomas Jaeger, European law expert at the University of Vienna, was interviewed on the Kluwer Patent Blog about the unitary patent system and gave his opinion on this topic.
The U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, is seeking public comments on a new draft policy statement on SEPs and FRAND. Mike Mireles reports for IP Finance.
The UKIPO is conducting an opinion survey on standard-essential patents to better understand the function of the current framework for promoting innovation. IP Finance reports.
Prof. Dennis Crouch discusses patent claims cancellation and inter partes review (IPR) in the U.S. and comments on the case of Baxter Corp. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.
OTHER
Have you ever heard about "negative Intellectual Property spaces"? In a post for CREATe, Raffaele Danna (Researcher, Institute of Economics of the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies), Arianna Martinelli ( Associate Professor of Applied Economics, Institute of Economics of the Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies), and Alessandro Nuvolari (Professor of Economic History and Director of the 'Institute of Economics of the Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna) provide insights and empirical evidence on this topic.
Around the IP Blogs
Reviewed by Giorgio Luceri
on
Sunday, December 12, 2021
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html