Following the publication of the European Commission’s Proposal in late 2020 and the adoption of negotiating mandates within both the European Parliament and the Council, trilogue negotiations are currently underway to define the eventual shape of what is expected to be a seminal piece of legislation in the EU: the Digital Services Act (DSA).
From the safe harbour regime to due diligence obligations, from the harmonization of notice-and-action mechanisms to the regulation of trusted flaggers, this new legislation will apply to several areas of the law and also have a substantial impact on the interpretation, application, and enforcement of intellectual property rules.
The Institute for Intellectual Property and Market Law (IFIM) at Stockholm University, which I have the honour and pleasure to direct, is delighted to host a new online webinar on 30 March 2022 (between 16:00 and 18:00 CET) to analyze and evaluate the potential impact of some of the most relevant provisions of the DSA.
Following an overview of the current state of negotiations, some of the key stakeholders will offer their views on points which are currently being debated in the context of such negotiations. An analysis of the interplay between the DSA and Article 17 of the DSM Directive 2019/790 (DSMD) will be also provided.
The programme is as follows:
16:00 – 16:05: Welcome
16:05 – 16:20: Shaping the DSA the current state of negotiations
Clothilde Goujard
16:20 – 17:10: Stakeholders’ views
Flavio Arzarello
Linn Berggren
Jaymeen Patel
Ludvig Werner
Chair: Eleonora Rosati
17:10 – 17:25: Points of contact between the DSA and Article 17 DSMD
Martin Senflteben
17:25 – 17:40: Discussion and Q&As: What way forward?
The Speakers (in alphabetical order) are:
- Flavio Arzarello, Public Policy Manager (Meta)
- Linn Berggren, Regulatory and Public Affairs Manager (Nordic Entertainment Group)
- Clothilde Goujard, Technology Reporter (Politico)
- Jaymeen Patel, Head of Brussels Office (LVMH)
- Eleonora Rosati, Professor of Intellectual Property Law (Stockholm University) and Director (IFIM)
- Martin Senftleben, Professor of Intellectual Property Law (University of Amsterdam) and Director (IViR)
- Ludvig Werner, Managing Director (IFPI Sweden)
IPKat readers are warmly invited to attend the webinar. Just click here to register!
Shaping the Digital Services Act: What impact on intellectual property? An online event
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, March 07, 2022
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, March 07, 2022
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html