UK IPO clears IP rights examination backlog

Readers will be pleased to hear that the UK intellectual property office (IPO) has announced that its IP rights examination has cleared a backlog - of more than 45,000 patent, trade mark and designs applications – which is now down to zero, for the first time in several years. Here is what the IPO have to say about it: 


In May, the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) cleared its examination backlogs for the first time in several years. ‘Backlogs’ refers to cases that take longer than IPO’s service standards. It follows two of the busiest years in IPO’s history, where record numbers of applications and change requests were received. Clearing backlogs has resulted in a faster service for IPO’s customers. Over the last three years, customer satisfaction with IPO’s speed of service for patent examination has almost doubled, rising from 42% in 2019 to 75% in 2022. Overall, IPO achieved a customer satisfaction score of 88% in March 2022, a score which is among the highest in the UK across any industry. It also exceeds its Ministerial target of 85%. Tim Moss, IPO’s CEO said: 

Clearing our backlogs has been a huge team effort, especially given the challenges we faced in Brexit and Covid-19. Our teams have worked incredibly hard and made processes more efficient to help us complete examinations more quickly. Now we have cleared the backlogs we can focus firmly on our transformation plans.

The patent examination backlog

The patent examination backlog has been steadily growing over the previous two decades. Patent backlogs are those that have not been examined more than 42 months after the initial application.

In the last three years the number of late patent examinations reduced from 13,000 to zero. The scale of the work is unprecedented for IPO. Last April the patent backlog stood at 6,007 cases, consisting of 12,000,000 pages.

The trade marks and designs backlog

In 2020 and 2021 there was also a significant backlog of trade mark and design applications, caused by three main factors:

1. The number of trade mark applications has soared. Domestic trade mark applications have more than doubled over five years – from around 65,000, to more than 150,000 last year.

2. Since the UK exited the European Union, customers now have to go to UKIPO if they want UK protection - previously they could file at the EUIPO and gain UK protection.

3. The covid-19 pandemic led to new businesses being set up or businesses diversifying in response.

At its peak, in March 2021 the trade mark backlog stood at 32,185 trade mark applications, with it taking 35 days for the examination process. Now that the trade mark backlog has been cleared IPO is processing trade mark applications within its target of 10 days. IPO also had a backlog of 9,507 design applications, with it taking 32 days to process a case. This has now also been cleared.

Clearing our backlogs is great preparation for IPO’s next steps as an organisation...Starting with a clean slate will mean it’s easier to move people over to our new digital services.

Changes to the IP register

The huge increase in IPO’s workload extended to changes to  the IP register, such as, changes of address. 2021 saw IPO receive 80,000 more change requests for trade marks and designs than it would receive in a typical year. This is a combined increase of 335% more change request forms than an average year, which resulted in it taking 33 days for changes to be processed. This backlog has now been cleared. 

How did IPO clear the backlogs?

Clearing the backlogs was a huge team effort for the IPO, especially given the considerable challenges faced in Brexit and Covid-19. The teams made processes more efficient to complete examinations more quickly. A number of service improvements were made to help clear the patents backlog:

1. Patents examinations were streamlined so they focus on the most important and relevant things first, taking into account the legal requirements and the customers’ considerations. This saved the IPO time, but is also better for customers, because they get more clear and succinct guidance on the issues that are most relevant to them.

2. ‘Technology clusters’ were created so work on different subject matters (e.g. measuring devices or automobiles) could be shared across a wider pool of colleagues. This allows IPO to focus  resources on the areas where it has the most demand at any given time.

3. IPO improved the way applications were handled so non-specialist staff could help examiners with early work on an application.

For trade marks and designs, given the surge in applications we’ve seen, IPO needed to recruit a number of examiners to cover the continued demand for their services. However the team has also:

1. Invested in better forecasting across trade marks and designs, which allowed IPO to plan resource more effectively in order to become more flexible and cope with demand.

2. Had a root and branch review of our processes, improving efficiency by managing our workflow differently, adopting new methods of training and continuing to make small improvements to IPO’s systems.

UK IPO clears IP rights examination backlog UK IPO clears IP rights examination backlog Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher on Monday, June 20, 2022 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Good, and indeed we are pleased to hear that. Hm. I even more look forward to critical discussion of the office's clearly 100% positive messages. The stuff was all happy about the pressure? Even during Brexit and Covid19? The stuff does not fear for further demandings from above? Applicants and representatives confirm in 45,000 cases that "speed before quality" left them satisfied?


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.