At the end of the second week of April with the sun starting to emerge, here are the latest Katposts.
Copyright
Image by Francesco Ungaro |
Nedim Malevich reported the words of Deborah De Angelis, who discussed the recent conflict between SIAE and Meta in relation to Italian music on Facebook and Instagram.
Anna Maria Stein discussed the recently issued “Copyright registration guide: works containing material generated by artificial intelligence” by the US Copyright Office.
Patents
Rose Hughes discussed the implementation of the new sequence listing requirement for patent applications, ST.26, and the challenges associated with the same.
Rose Hughes reported on some of the features of the technical aspects of claims interpretation and on the recent EPO’s position of the description to narrow the meaning of clear language in the same claims.
Trademarks
Anna Maria Stein discussed whether it is possible to register multimedia trade marks in accordance with the EU Trade Mark regulation.
Designs
Marcel Pemsel commented on the EU design protection of single components of complex products, especially in relation to the judgement B&Bartoni v EUIPO (case T-617/21).
Other
Anastasia Kyrylenko reviewed the book “Intellectual Property and Development – Geographical Indications in Practice by Barbara Pick (Routledge, 2022).
Neil Wilkof let the IPKat readers know that the Book Depository will be closing on the 26th April 2023 and thanked the same readers.
Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Chiara Gallo
on
Saturday, April 15, 2023
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html