[Guest post] Burberry ‘Knight Blue’ and Gucci ‘Rosso Ancora’: New signature colours and also trade marks in the making?
The IPKat has received and is pleased to host the following guest post authored by Katfriends Antonios Baris and Spyridon Sipetas (both Stockholm University), reflecting on the IP implications of the recent unveiling, by Burberry and Gucci, of two new signature colours: Knight Blue and Rosso Ancora, respectively. Here's what Antonios and Spyridon write:
Burberry ‘Knight Blue’ and Gucci ‘Rosso Ancora’: New signature colours and also trade marks in the making?
by Antonios Baris and Spyridon Sipetas
This September’s Fashion Week introduced us to the Spring/Summer 2024 collections of all major fashion houses and brought along with it the emergence of their new signature colours.
Gucci Ancora's Roblox event |
brand identity. Its role is substantial not only in distinguishing the products of a company from those of its competitors, but also in influencing moods, feelings and attitudes. Hence, it is apparent that colours play an essential role in building the brand image of a company, due to the association between a brand and its signature colour in the target consumers’ perception.
It is common knowledge that - especially in the luxury sector - the brand can be one of the most valuable assets of the company. “People buy things not for what they can do, but also for what they mean” (Levy, 1959). Many fashion houses seem to have taken that into account, by making - not always successful - attempts to establish certain colours as their distinctive signs.
Honourable mentions of such efforts include the OG of brand It colours, i.e., Hermès’s unflinching orange, Tiffany & Co.’s Tiffany Blue, Valentino’s PP Pink, Bottega Veneta’s Parakeet Green and the two latest entries: Burberry’s Knight Blue and Gucci’s Rosso Ancora.
The Spring/Summer 2024 Fashion Week has made it clear that newly appointed creative directors at prestigious fashion houses are determined to leave their own mark in the history of their brand.
Burberry’s Knight Blue
Following Riccardo Tisci’s succession by Daniel Lee, British fashion house Burberry, in its latest collection, has introduced us to a signature motif as well as a new signature colour of the brand: Knight Blue.
Burberry's new Knight Blue windows next to well-established Tiffany blue ones in Florence |
And while the effort of the brand to establish this shade as a new symbol of the house - at least marketing-wise - seems to be intense, whether it will manage to acquire distinctiveness in order to be granted trade mark protection remains a matter of undefined future.
Needless to say, Burberry is a brand with a valuable IPR portfolio, currently consisting of 27 trade marks registered at the EUIPO level and more than 300 across the EU territory. The tartan trade mark’s reputation, in specific, has secured protection for 4 different variations of it (registrations Nos. 017215237, 017215245, 017535832, 017535816). However, interestingly enough, the EUIPO recently denied trade mark protection of the tartan pattern for virtual goods- that Burberry applied for so as to cover digital collectibles and NFT’s.
Gucci’s Rosso Ancora
Shortly afterwards, in Milan, Sabato De Sarno’s debut show ‘Gucci Ancora’ also introduced us to a new aspiring It colour: Rosso Ancora. The colour could be described as “a deep and rich shade of oxblood, just a few shades darker than the middle stripe in Gucci’s signature tri-stripe motif”. It was inspired by the interiors of London’s Savoy Hotel, where Guccio Gucci, founder of the house, used to work. Gucci also has a remarkable collection which currently counts 29 registered trade marks at the EUIPO alone.
Eagerly waiting to shop Gucci ss 2024 collection... |
New colour trade marks too?
But how could all these efforts translate in terms of trade mark law?
Both Burberry and Gucci are aware that it takes time and a meticulous strategy to efficiently protect their assets, particularly new signature colours. While it is inarguable that colours per se are eligible for trade mark protection, given that they possess little inherent capacity for communicating information (see still today the landmark Libertel CJEU judgment), the brands would likely have to prove that the colour in question has acquired distinctiveness through use, pursuant to Article 7(3) of the Trade Mark Regulation (2017/1001).
This may sound as an easy task for a luxury fashion house. Nonetheless, many major brands, such as Louis Vuitton, have found the process of providing evidence of acquired distinctiveness challenging, eventually failing to receive trade mark protection (Louis Vuitton – Damier Azur, T-275/21, commented on The IPKat here). Yet, some success stories of colour trade marks in the fashion sector are those of Hermès, which has managed to secure protection for its signature colour ‘Orange H’ (Filing No. 002965549) and Tiffany & Co. that has registered the colour ‘Tiffany Blue’ as a trade mark in several jurisdictions.
In a nutshell, in order for Burberry and Gucci to be granted trade mark protection for ‘Knight Blue’ and ‘Rosso Ancora’ respectively, their acquired distinctiveness needs to be proven. Only time will tell whether their promising start - in terms of promotion - will be followed by the necessary acts to accomplish such a challenging mission. Will these new signature colours live up to the reputation of the brands’ previous distinctive signs, moving their empires even forward?
[Guest post] Burberry ‘Knight Blue’ and Gucci ‘Rosso Ancora’: New signature colours and also trade marks in the making?
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Monday, September 25, 2023
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html