This Kat is excited for a talk about IP and new technology |
AI Copyright Lecture
IP Finance Dialogue
The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is holding the IP Finance Dialogue: Expanding Horizons on IP Finance and Valuation on November 21, 2023. The event aims to provide a platform where valuation and IP professionals, industry leaders, policymakers, entrepreneurs and investors can convene to explore alternative strategies and novel approaches to unlock intangible assets and IP finance. The event will take place in hybrid format at the WIPO headquarters in Geneva and over Zoom. Details and registration here.
Trademarks and Free Speech
Last week, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Vidal v. Elster. Steve Elster attempted to register the phrase “TRUMP TOO SMALL” for use on various types of shirts, intending the mark to serve as political commentary on President Donald Trump and his policies. The Court is considering the question of whether the refusal to register a trademark when the mark contains criticism of a government official or public figure violates the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. This is the third time in six years the Court has been asked to address the relationship between trademark registration and free speech. Readers may wish to revisit the IPKat's coverage of the Tam and Brunetti decisions while awaiting the Court's next opinion.
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html