 |
| Already in Alicante ready to discuss all things IP |
Coinciding with the 30th anniversary of the EUIPO, the conference is one of the major events organized by the EUIPO Boards of Appeal and focuses on leveraging case-law as its cornerstone, while also delving into the recent legislative reforms across various IP realms. Moreover, it explores the challenges that a high-tech environment presents for IP, in particular trade marks, designs, GIs, and copyright.
The conference gathers influential figures drawn from private practice, judiciary, academia, and major IP offices to engage in discussions.
Having participated in the past, I can say that the conference is truly interactive as it is designed to encourage exchanges among participants through panel debates, each covering four key topics related to a specific session.
According to the conference programme, the sessions are as follows:
- Session 1: An Odyssey Through the Evolving Landscape of Trade Mark General Court Judgments
- Session 2: A Deep-Dive into latest Design Case-law and Developments: Multi-layered Perspectives
- Session 3: Reconciling the Old with the New: Challenges of Trade Mark Modernization
- Session 4: IP Code-breaking in the Era of AI Advancements
- Session 5: Copyright in flux: What does the future have in store?
- Session 6: Crafting the Future: New perspectives for Geographical Indications
- Session 7: Quality through Coherence and Consistency: Reflections and Visions
To learn more and to register (until 22 April), click here. See you in sunny Alicante!
EUIPO IP Case-Law Conference returns to Alicante and online on 29-30 April
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, February 07, 2024
Rating:
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, February 07, 2024
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html