Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

IPKat's Weekly Catch-Up: Stay Informed! 

(Created using Imagen 3)

Copyright

Katfriend Peter Teunissen reports on Advocate General Szpunar's opinion in the legal battle between Lego and Delta Sport.

Designs

Anastasiia Kyrylenko informs readers of the CJEU's upcoming decision on the compatibility of national exhaustion with EU law.

Patents

Rose Hughes analyzes the application of EPO decision G 2/21 to software inventions, with a focus on artificial intelligence.

Katfriend Greg Corcoran discusses the EPO decision G 1/24, and its effect on state of the art and inventive step.

Plant Varieties

Jocelyn Bosse reports on Nigeria becoming the 80th member of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).

Trade Marks

Alessandro Cerri details the UKIPO's decision regarding a partial trademark revocation case involving Transport for London (TfL).

Book Reviews

Katfriend Spyros Sipetas reviews the "Handbook of Fashion Law and Business," providing insights into the book's content and relevance.

IP events and opportunities

Eleonora Rosati informs readers about the European Academy of Law (ERA) summer courses on European IP and Data Law.

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week! Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi on Monday, March 31, 2025 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.