Another action-packed week has wrapped up on the blog, delivering a wealth of jurisprudence on everything from artificial intelligence to seedless mandarins.
Should you need to catch up, here is the IPKat's rapid-fire digest of the latest news!
 |
| The IPKat sifts through the archives to ensure it's "Never Too Late" to catch up. |
Artificial Intelligence and the Digital Frontier
Rose Hughes explored the cautionary tale of United States v. Heppner, where a US court ruled that defense strategies drafted via the AI "Claude" were not protected by attorney-client privilege, reminding practitioners that prompts entered into public AI tools are rarely confidential.
Georgia Jenkins analysed the US Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in the Thaler case, arguing that while copyright law firmly clings to the human authorship requirement, private platform contracts and terms of use are quietly stepping in to allocate rights and construct a market for AI-generated works.
Trademarks
Katfriend Natalia Basałaj chronicled the rise of the "Biscoff" empire, breaking down Lotus Bakeries' strategic move away from the generic "Speculoos" name to a globally protected brand bolstered by a comprehensive portfolio of 3D shapes, jar designs, and strict B2B guidelines.
Marcel Pemsel commented on the General Court's Empreinte v EUIPO decision, warning designers that even highly original or "ergonomic" features — like a corkscrew handle moulded to a human hand grip — will fall foul of the functionality exclusion if they are necessary to obtain a technical result.
Söğüt Atilla-Aydın scrutinised the EUIPO Board of Appeal’s invalidation of the mark "BREITLING FOR WOMEN", highlighting the Office's firm stance against parasitic filing strategies that attempt to piggyback on well-known brands without a legitimate, commercially logical justification.
Plant Varieties
Jocelyn Bosse reported on a rare and technically dense ruling from the UK Patents Court in Nador Cott Protection v Asda, detailing why the seedless 'Tang Gold' mandarin was found not to be an "essentially derived variety" of the 'Nadorcott', while providing valuable insights into the "cascade principle".
Image credit: Gemini AI
Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Rating:
Reviewed by Simone Lorenzi
on
Thursday, March 19, 2026
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html