Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Search results for combination product
The SPC alphabet: Are combination product SPCs precluded by Article 3(a), (c) and/or (d)? The SPC alphabet: Are combination product SPCs precluded by Article 3(a), (c) and/or (d)? Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, December 13, 2021 Rating: 5
New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel) New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, March 07, 2022 Rating: 5
[Guest Post] CJEU weighs in on supplementary protection certificates in Merck v Teva/Clonmel decision [Guest Post] CJEU weighs in on supplementary protection certificates in Merck v Teva/Clonmel decision Reviewed by Jocelyn Bosse on Thursday, February 13, 2025 Rating: 5
Would you like a side of Mr Justice Arnold on SPCs with your wind turbine? Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases Would you like a side of Mr Justice Arnold on SPCs with your wind turbine? Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, January 26, 2017 Rating: 5
Compulsive Reference Disorder: another SPC case heads for the Duchy -- Part I Compulsive Reference Disorder: another SPC case heads for the Duchy -- Part I Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, October 17, 2013 Rating: 5
Peas and the peculiarities of product-by-process patents (T 1065/23) Peas and the peculiarities of product-by-process patents (T 1065/23) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Friday, July 18, 2025 Rating: 5
Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, May 17, 2021 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Posts ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.