Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Oliver Fairhurst, Claire Gregg, Georgia Jenkins and Marcel Pemsel.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Jocelyn Bosse (Book Review Editor).

InternKats: Wissam Bentazar, Simone Lorenzi and Kliment Markov.
Search results for combination product
The SPC alphabet: Are combination product SPCs precluded by Article 3(a), (c) and/or (d)? The SPC alphabet: Are combination product SPCs precluded by Article 3(a), (c) and/or (d)? Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, December 13, 2021 Rating: 5
New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel) New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, March 07, 2022 Rating: 5
[Guest Post] CJEU weighs in on supplementary protection certificates in Merck v Teva/Clonmel decision [Guest Post] CJEU weighs in on supplementary protection certificates in Merck v Teva/Clonmel decision Reviewed by Jocelyn Bosse on Thursday, February 13, 2025 Rating: 5
Would you like a side of Mr Justice Arnold on SPCs with your wind turbine? Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases Would you like a side of Mr Justice Arnold on SPCs with your wind turbine? Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases Reviewed by Annsley Merelle Ward on Thursday, January 26, 2017 Rating: 5
Compulsive Reference Disorder: another SPC case heads for the Duchy -- Part I Compulsive Reference Disorder: another SPC case heads for the Duchy -- Part I Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, October 17, 2013 Rating: 5
Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? Does the Irish Court of Appeal in Merck v Clonmel part ways from the CJEU's Santen Article 3(d) decision? Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Monday, May 17, 2021 Rating: 5
Australian Full Court clarifies the meaning of "first approval" for the purpose of patent term extension (PTE) Australian Full Court clarifies the meaning of "first approval" for the purpose of patent term extension (PTE) Reviewed by Dr Rose Hughes on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 Rating: 5
Subscribe to: Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.