For the half-year to 30 June 2014, the IPKat's regular team is supplemented by contributions from guest bloggers Alberto Bellan, Darren Meale and Nadia Zegze.

Two of our regular Kats are currently on blogging sabbaticals. They are David Brophy and Catherine Lee.

Saturday, 25 December 2004


Normally the very epitome of correctness in these matters, The Register slipped up badly with its headline "Killer hoover attacks Scotsman" , the machine in question being not a HOOVER but a DYSON.

A Google Image search for "killer + dyson" identified the above illustration

The IPKat wonders whether this unfortunate incident would fall within the definition of trade mark infringement under Article 5 of Council Directive 89/104.

1 comment:

Peter Groves said...

Don't you mean it was a DYSON vacuum cleaner, not a HOOVER vacuum cleaner?

Asn for whether the use would fall within Article 5, it sometimes seems to me that almost everything does these days.

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':