NO TO MORE SOFTWARE PATENTS, SAYS UK GOVERNMENT


In a move that was widely expected by the UK patent fraternity, the UK Government yesterday announced its opposition to the relaxation of existing rules on the patentability of computer software. The announcement, in its relevant part, reads as follows:
Minister for Science & Innovation, Lord Sainsbury, ... outlined the Government's firm commitment to a patent system which fosters and supports innovation in all areas of technology, including inventions which rely on software.

The proposed European Directive on the patentability of computer-implemented inventions will not adversely impact on the software market, particularly in relation to Open Source, but will instead help support a strong and vibrant technology based industry.

Critics of the proposed Directive, who have been engaged in a letter writing campaign to government and MPs over the last five years, today were invited to discuss their concerns at a meeting with the Minister and Patent Office officials.

Speaking at the meeting Lord Sainsbury said:

"It is vital for Europe to have a climate which supports the software industry, including the valuable role Open Source has to play."

"Patents provide the confidence to invest in R&D for technological industries and the current draft Directive will ensure that Europe continues to strikes the right balance and provides clarity as to what can and cannot be patented with regard to computer-implemented inventions. It does not change anything, but maintains the status quo."

"Changes in patent practice in the US in the last five years have caused concern in some areas of the computer industry and the Directive will ensure that Europe continues on its own path which is a balanced approach that both creates a climate for innovation and supports open source software."

Peter Hayward of the Patent Office also addressed the meeting. He said:

"The Directive, in its current form, is vital in protecting the innovations in the European software market."

"The intention is to maintain high criteria for those seeking patent protection, and to prevent any drift in patent standards towards the current US position."

"This was a highly productive meeting which brought out a number of key issues in the discussion which we will take forward."

The Patent Office has been in consultation with the software industry since 1994. Responses to both formal and informal consultation have indicated that the law does not need to be changed, but requires clarification.

The Patent Office estimates that up to 20% of patent applications received are for inventions which use software. Mere computer program listings, like lines of code, are protected by copyright but excluded from patent protection in the UK and Europe. However inventions in which software makes a technical contribution, like a mobile telephone or car engine management systems, have always been and will continue to be patentable. Patents like these underpin the research and development infrastructures of many hi-tech businesses in Europe.

The Directive is expected to return to the European Parliament for a second reading early next year.
The IPKat welcomes the UK government's position which, he feels, strikes a workable balance between the competing interests upon which the software industry depends for its dynamism and its long-term growth.

What the Computer Implemented Inventions Directive means here
Comments on the proposed Directive here, here and here
NO TO MORE SOFTWARE PATENTS, SAYS UK GOVERNMENT NO TO MORE SOFTWARE PATENTS, SAYS UK GOVERNMENT Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, December 15, 2004 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. Market oi millions with blogblasterinternet marketing servicesinternet marketing services
    Please go to http://ww.blog-masters.net

    ReplyDelete
  2. Imagine the power of tens of thousands of other web sites being able to easily

    ReplyDelete
  3. endless number of these wonderful finds, what with the Internet being a vast network of constantly evolving ideas and all!

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.