PANTS OFF IN ANTI-AMBUSH MARKETING FRENZY


Pants off in anti-ambush marketing frenzy

The IPKat reads with incredulity that miserable megalomaniac moneygrabbing sports admininstrators FIFA ordered hundreds of Dutch fans to take off their trousers before entering the stadium for their country's World Cup match against Ivory Coast on Friday. The fans were wearing dungarees in the Dutch team's orange colour, but bearing the logo of a Dutch beer company that was not one of the World Cup official sponsors. Said FIFA:
"Anyone can wear whatever they want, but if a company tries to carry out ambush marketing, FIFA must prevent that happening. In common with the IOC (International Olympic Committee) and UEFA, we do not tell individual supporters what to wear, but ... FIFA has already won a court case against a beer manufacturer who tried this sort of thing".
What this means is
"Anyone can wear whatever they want, if FIFA says so".
American beer Budweiser and Germany's Bitburger are thus the only beers that can be sold, or even worn by spectators, in the 12 World Cup stadiums.

The IPKat wonders what FIFA would have done, had the offending garments been t-shirts worn by thousands of young ladies.

Says Merpel, for those of us who are saturated with Budweiser's mass marketing and fancy a refreshing change, the Dutch brewer's imaginative ploy is most welcome. For the record, most media - presumably because they benefit handsomely from Budweiser's vast advertising budget - coyly refuse to tell us the identity of this Dutch upstart. The company is called Bavaria NV (thanks, localnewswatch.com, for that information) and anyone who supports the principle of competition should buy its ales.
PANTS OFF IN ANTI-AMBUSH MARKETING FRENZY PANTS OFF IN ANTI-AMBUSH MARKETING FRENZY Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, June 18, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.