Copyright and Other Fairy TalesNow here's a bit of serious, scholarly fun. It comes in the form of a book published by this year by up-and-coming IP publishers Edward Elgar: Copyright and Other Fairy Tales, edited by Helle Porsdam (below, left).
Publisher's blurb:"Once the preserve of a few legal specialists, the wider implications of copyright law are more and more the concern of literary scholars and cultural analysts as well as of increasingly sceptical lawyers. Helle Porsdam is to be congratulated on assembling and editing this interesting collection of essays, which rightly opens up even further the debate on the cultural role of copyright law, one in which every one of us should participate.’ (Ruth Towse, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands).
The present state of copyright law and the way in which it threatens the remix of culture and creativity is a shared concern of the contributors to this unique book. Whether or not to remain within the underlying regime of intellectual property law, and what sort of reforms are needed if we do decide to remain within this regime, are fundamental questions that form the subtext for their discussions".
What the IPKat says: the book's subtitle, "Hans Christian Andersen and the Commodification of Creativity", gives a clue as to what's in store. There are some cracking good chapters, which is no surprise given the calibre of the work's contributors. Uma Suthersanen's "Bleak House or Great Expectations? The literary author as a stakeholder in 19th century international copyright politics" is an enjoyably provocative romp that leaves the reader with the uncomfortable feeling that he hasn't spotted all the literary allusions that the author has placed before him. Also of note is the thought-exercise of Marieke van Schijndel and Joost Smiers, who urge us to imagine a world without copyright. Er, says Merpel, I think a lot of people who inhabit the blogosphere have been imagining this for quite a while now.
Bookish details. Hardback, ISBN 1845 426010, £49.95 (£44.96 if you buy it from the publisher's website). Rupture factor: minimal. Extent: vi + 172 pages of printed stuff, plus 12 blank pages of your very own for colouring in with crayons ...More on Hans Christian Andersen, Arthur Andersen and Lale Andersen.
Going round and roundThis is a message for recipients of the IPKat's email notifications. Some of you, when seeking to reply to points made by the IPKat and Merpel, press the "reply" button on your circulars. Alas, this means that you probably aren't hitting your intended target - though sometimes your comments get circulated to the other email circular recipients.
If you want to comment on a blog, or just write to say "hello", can you do it by emailing the IPKat here. If you're not yet on the IPKat's mailing list but would like to be, then just write in here and he'll add you in.
COPYRIGHT AND OTHER FAIRY TALES; GOING ROUND AND ROUND
![COPYRIGHT AND OTHER FAIRY TALES; GOING ROUND AND ROUND]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, June 06, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html