Canada opens door to dissimilar goods infringement

Mixed news for big-brand owners in Canada, following Friday’s Canadian Supreme Court ruling, The Star reports. First the good news. The court was prepared to acknowledge that trade mark infringement can occur where the defendant is using goods which are not similar to those on which the mark-owner has used his goods.

Barbie (left) was unavailable for comment

However, the Court held that each case must be judged on its own merits, and in the two cases before it, there was no infringement. This was because consumers would not confuse Barbie, the well-endowed but physically improbable dollie with a small chain of restaurants also named Barbie, nor would consumers confuse a mid-price clothing company named Cliquot with Veuve Clicquot champagne.

The IPKat notes that in order to comply with Art.16 of the TRIPs Agreement, WTO Members must provide protection against uses of famous marks on dissimilar goods.

Hi kids!

A bunch of online types report on the joys of Canada’s latest superhero – Captain Copyright. He doesn’t rescue people from burning buildings, but he does teach children about the evils of copyright infringement. He also provides fun games for children and informs them of useful facts, like the average royalty for authors (though the IPKat suspects that this has more to do with publishers than copyright law) and the meaning of moral rights.

The IPKat says that if children are taught all this at grade school, what will there be left for them to learn an university?
SOMETHING FOR THE CHILDREN SOMETHING FOR THE CHILDREN Reviewed by Unknown on Sunday, June 04, 2006 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. "The IPKat says that if children are taught all this at grade school, what will there be left for them to learn an university?"

    That's when they learn to be creative, so they can put their IP skills to practice. These creativity courses include singing, playing games with the other students, dancing in a circle, making drawings for their mothers, etc...

    I guess what I'm saying is that the IP courses should move from grade school to kindergarten. Imagine the consequences for society if someone steals a drawing they make as a three year old and they don't know how to enforce their rights!


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.