Jolie drops perfume opposition; baby refuses to comment

The IPKat was happy to learn from the Washington Post that Angelina Jolie has dropped her opposition to an application by Symine Salimpour to register SHILOH as the name of a perfume. Shiloh, as all good celebrity-followers should know, is the name of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s progeny. Ms Salimpour argues that although the application was filed after the baby was named, the fact that it coincided with the baby’s name was coincidence. According to Salimpour 'In Hebrew, Shiloh means 'his gift…And I will use the perfume to give something back to the children of Israel and the Middle East." The IPKat notes that it is also the name of a place in Israel with biblical origins.

The IPKat is rather puzzled here. On what grounds did Ms Jolie think she could stop others from using the name? Names per se don’t attract intellectual property rights, particularly ones which had strongly established pre-existing meanings. The best argument that the IPKat can think of is that perhaps the name would cause people to think the baby was endorsing the perfume. However, the IPKat isn’t sure of the value of a baby’s endorsement for this kind of product. Babies, while lovely, aren’t always fragrant. Moreover, a baby can’t actually sign a licensing contract. Its parents might be able to, but surely no parent would sell their baby in this way would they…?
Jolie drops perfume opposition; baby refuses to comment Jolie drops perfume opposition; baby refuses to comment Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 01, 2007 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. The issue of copyrighting baby names is one that just may become more prominent with more parents looking for the most unique name for their baby. Although it is highly doubtful that any law will be enacted allowing parents to copyright their baby names, it just may be that many parents will try.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think Jolie afraid of people associate her and Brad to the perfume since the baby is their child. Is it unfair competition?

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.