Coq au vin?

The IPKat was bemused to learn from News10.net that winemakers E & J Gallo are suing the makers of ceramic chickens for trade mark dilution. The said chickens, together with a range of kitchenware, are being sold under the name Gallo de Oro by their Texan makers, Fitz and Floyd.

The IPKat says that behind the amusement value, there’s a serious issue. One might wonder whether consumers would view GALLO as being distinctive, since it’s not English, but then if one thinks about it, the US has a sizeable Hispanic population, who would see the word as descriptive, particularly when used in the context of this context. This all goes to show that if we choose to create a cause of action which spans uses across all classes, we need to think carefully about uses which may be distinctive in one class but descriptive in others.

Coq au vin? Coq au vin? Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 09, 2008 Rating: 5

2 comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.