Google News saga aficionados will promptly remember that on 22 March
last, following approval by the Bundestag,
the German Bundesrat passed a piece of legislation known as Leistungsschutzrecht
für Presseverlege (‘LSR’)
or - more conveniently (especially for those non-German speakers who nonetheless are keen Latinists) - Lex
Google.
This new piece of legislation extended press publishers’ copyright by granting
them an ancillary right over news contents. The newly created sections 87f, 87g and 87h of the German
Copyright Act provide for the exclusive right of press publishers to exploit
their contents commercially for one year, thus preventing search engines and
news aggregators from displaying excerpts from
newspaper articles without paying a fee.
|
Publishers queuing (with their black cats) to opt-in Google News |
Despite widespread criticisms against the
German law (including Google itself and the German Association of Start-ups), possible introduction of something akin to
the German LSR is currently being considered elsewhere in Europe.
In any case, the adoption of the LSR was not the end of
the story.
Last Friday Google announced that, starting August 1 [this is also the date when new sections 87f-h enter into force], there will be
changes to the way Google News works in Germany. The popular news aggregation
service will in fact start indexing only sources that decide to opt-in explicitly,
while maintaining its opting-out mechanism in the other 60 countries in which
it is currently available [remember what happened in Brazil a few months ago?].
This is the announcement by Google, as reported by Forbes and translated from German thanks to ... Google
Translate:
A few weeks
ago a law was passed in Germany: the related right for press publishers. In
light of this development, and in light of the legal uncertainty that comes
from the law, we have introduced a new confirmation system. With this we offer
German publishers another way to tell us whether their contents (continued) to
be displayed in Google News. This new confirmation statement is an addition to
the existing technical possibilities for publishers to determine for themselves
whether their contents to be displayed in our services – or not. Such tools
such as robots.txt be recognized alongside Google and many other search
|
Merpel loves to catch up with latest IP news on Sunday mornings |
engines
and Internet services.
In all other
countries, we will maintain in force, proven process: if a publisher makes its
content available on the net, they are included in Google News. If publishers
do not wish to be included in Google News, you can use a variety of technical
options (robots.txt, meta tags) use to prevent indexing by Google – or simply
tell us that their content will not be recorded. This is the best way to ensure
that a wide variety of publishing votes are represented in our service – and
not just those who have the administrative resources and the time for such
processes.
According to TechCrunch, some major German publishers have already announced their intention to
opt-in in order to be featured in Google News.
This looks like
a smart move by Google, says Merpel, who also recalls that Google News is a
non-commercial service (no ads, no revenues, etc). If it had been otherwise,
then Google might have been able, not just to avoid having to pay the fees required
under the LSR, but also ask the publishers to pay to be indexed.
An alternative analysis might suggest that no action was required in the first place.
ReplyDeleteA few publishers huffed and puffed, a law was passed, Google adapted, news publishers got real and opted-in.
Given that passing a law is not a free good, e.g., will require some lawyers' fees (oh, wait... all is clear) and subsequent compliance monitoring, hasn't the deadweight cost of the wonders of IP just inceased?