The Author's Take. 📷✍️📚 |
JIPLP is the weblog of the Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. Here's where editorial panellists, readers and contributors can come together and share their view on all aspects of IP law and practice. And here are the Author’s Takes of August 2017:
by Yin Harn Lee
Lecturer in Law, University of Sheffield
by Luxmi (“Lux”) Rajanayagam
Queen Mary, University of London
by Mario Pozzi
Roedl&Partner Law Firm, Milan – Italy
In this post, Lasse Søndergaard Christensen and Louise Thorning Ahle analyze the possibilities of enforcement with regard to products protected as neither a registered nor an unregistered Community design on the Danish market.
In the recent decision W.F. Gözze Frottierweberei Gmbh, Wolfgang Gözze GmbH v Verein Bremer Baumwollbörse, case C-689/15, the European Court of Justice analyzes an issue which the EUTMR rules do not clearly resolve, i.e. whether or not a licensed EUTM registration may be invalidated if the owner fails to carry out quality controls on licensee/licensees’ products.
In Close Thais with Madrid, as from November, MARQUES reproduces the official WIPO notice regarding the accession by the Kingdom of Thailand to the Protocol Relating to the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks.
Photo courtesy of Mr. He Gong and his lovely kitten Ruobai.
Around the IP blogs!
Reviewed by Tian Lu
on
Thursday, August 24, 2017
Rating:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
1 comment:
RE: by Luxmi (“Lux”) Rajanayagam
Queen Mary, University of London: Louboutin v Van Haren - AG Szpunar’s position on Louboutin’s red sole mark: a shoo-in for a shape mark
It looks like wheel inventing.
This subject has been already studied by Dutch lawyers much in depth.
https://plus.google.com/115483929740716814877/posts/Emrcb8cSaUf
https://plus.google.com/115483929740716814877/posts/Py34FYF4Pdq
Post a Comment