Let's take a virtual
walk down the internet's IP boulevard to discover this past week's
headlines!
On copyright
street, we start off with a punch as Former
Professional Wrestler Sues Van Morrison for Using his Likeness
without Authorization. The 1709 blog reports that wrestling
legend Billy Two Rivers accused Van Morrison of using his likeness in
the cover of his latest album, fittingly called Roll With the
Punches, in violation of the New
York Civil Rights Law and the Trademarks Act.
The CREATe blog reported
on the event Exploring
Copy Ethics with CopyrightUser.org, held at the Centre for
Interdisciplinary Research at Bielefeld University. A comparative
discussion about “The Ethics of Citation and Partial Copying” in
civil and common law jurisdictions was carried out followed by the
presentation of the educational video “The Adventure of the Girl
with the Light Blue Hair” featuring more than 80 instances
copyright infringements in just under 4 minutes.
Also on the 1709 Blog,
this week's Copykat,
talks about the Statue of Liberty stamp, Beyonce's copyright pickle
and unauthorised use of photographs. In Cabin
Fever: Is Reconstructing a Work to Preserve It Copyright
Infringement? the post explores this very interesting area of Art
Law, adding to the equation the fact that the work in question
was sold in its original state, the first copyright registration
refused and the author disowned the work.
Turning onto the trade
marks road, the Kluwer Trademark Blog covered slippery slope of
How
“unitary” is an EUTM? CJEU decides in the KERRYGOLD matter.
If a mark can peacefully coexist with a EUTM in one part of the EU
but it does not in another, can the principle of the unitary mark
allow for trade mark infringement?
Walking on, the company
CeramTec GmbH maybe looked at the world through rose-coloured
glasses. Its trade mark application for a colour was refused as Pink
not very unusual for implants, rules Swiss court. The colour was
considered not distinctive compared to the others typically used in
the industry and the applicant failed to prove acquired
distinctiveness in the national market. News also reported by the
Kluwer Trademark Blog.
Fluttering around
denominations of origin alley. IP tango reports on Peruvian
Pisco: Renowned reputation. The Peruvian alcoholic beverage
Pisco, already a denomination of origin, was granted reputable
character by the Peruvian Institute
for the Defense of Free Competition and the Protection of
Intellectual Property (INDECOPI).
Straight on patent
lane, IPWatchdog talks about The
Costs of Patenting in Africa: A Tale of Three Intellectual Property
Systems. The post illustrates the differences and affinities of
the three coexisting patent systems of the continent (ARIPO, OAPI and South
Africa) and how much it costs in practice to maintain patent rights.
What is the boundary between patent and
copyright protection? Kevin
Collins on Patent Law's Authorship Screen: in his forthcoming
publication on the University of Chicago Law Review, as reported by the Written Description Blog, the author
discusses this intriguing topic, arguing “authorship screen is
important to prevent patents as "backdoor copyrights" that
"override the competition/protection balance" of copyright
law”.
Image credits: ddecloud
Around the IP Blogs
Reviewed by Cecilia Sbrolli
on
Wednesday, August 09, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html