IPKAT'S OCTOBER PATENT OF THE MONTH: I LOVE LUCY

Thinking of commissioning a new home or office but afraid that all those tasteful modern glass buildings are a bit “samey”? Are you looking for a house or HQ that will ensure that you stand out from the herd? Then the IPKat’s October Patent of the Month is just what you’ve been looking for. Granted to James V Lafferty in 1882, the claim is for:

“A building having the form of an animal, the body of which is constructed with floors divided into apartments, provided with windows and stair, and supported on hollow legs, one or all of which contain stairs, and supported on hollow legs, which afford access to the body…”

It seems that novelty requirements were less strict a century ago as Lafferty had already had a building in the shape of an elephant built the previous year in South Atlantic City. This building, affectionately known as Lucy, still stands today in what is now known as Margate NJ. However, Lucy’s sister pachyderms, the Light of Asia and Elephantine Colossus, did not survive. As well as being a building of “unique appearance”, as the patent specification points out, there is a functional aspect to Lucy. The elevation provided by the legs allows air to circulate beneath the body, resulting in “a building which is well ventilated and lighted”.

The IPKat is rather keen on this idea and feels that the City of London would definitely benefit from a building in the form of an IPKat.

Visit Lucy here
Visit Margate here
Fun you can have with an elephant here and here


IPKAT'S OCTOBER PATENT OF THE MONTH: I LOVE LUCY <strong>IPKAT'S OCTOBER PATENT OF THE MONTH: I LOVE LUCY</strong> Reviewed by Unknown on Friday, October 31, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.