On 1 October Namibia became the 123rd Contracting State of the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) when it deposited its instrument of accession at WIPO. The Treaty will enter into force for Namibia on 1 January 2004. In any international patent application filed on or after that date, an applicant may designate Namibia. Additionally, nationals and residents of Namibia may themselves file PCT applications as of the same date.
The IPKat wonders if the whole exercise is worthwhile. WIPO’s own patent filing statistics for 1997-2001 do not give any records of any Namibian patents having been applied for or granted (apparently Namibia has notched up only around five patents a year since 1990). It would be nice if a better means could be found for helping countries such as Namibia to atttract technology and industrial growth.
General information about patenting in Namibia here
Namibia’s current economic prospects here
A taste of Namibia here
The IPKat wonders if the whole exercise is worthwhile. WIPO’s own patent filing statistics for 1997-2001 do not give any records of any Namibian patents having been applied for or granted (apparently Namibia has notched up only around five patents a year since 1990). It would be nice if a better means could be found for helping countries such as Namibia to atttract technology and industrial growth.
General information about patenting in Namibia here
Namibia’s current economic prospects here
A taste of Namibia here
NAMIBIA JOINS PCT -- BUT WILL ANYONE NOTICE?
![NAMIBIA JOINS PCT -- BUT WILL ANYONE NOTICE?]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Friday, October 17, 2003
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html