The BBC reports on the trial of Tom Sinclair Junior. Mr Sinclair, an events promoter, falsely claimed that he had secured the services of the comedian Ali G (a.k.a. Sacha Baron Cohen) Haverfordwest carnival in Pembrokeshire, Wales, and became the sponsor of that carnival, selling more than 2,000 tickets at £8 a time, duping the carnival’s organiser in the process. Once Pembrokeshire Trading Standards became suspicious, Sinclair forged a contract with Ali G and hired a look-alike named “Dat Ali Gee”. However, the carnival was cancelled because of a noise limit being imposed and Sinclair was tried and later convicted of making false statements on Friday. He is yet to be sentenced, though the judge has warned that he may face imprisonment.
The IPKat notes that although this was a criminal case, the elements of passing off seem to have been made out – Ali G most certainly has a reputation and a misrepresentation was made. Such an action that suppresses the use of look-alikes could go part of the way towards establishing a de facto personality right for celebrities.
Ali G impersonators here
Pass yourself off as Ali G here and here
Pass your cat off as Ali G here
The IPKat notes that although this was a criminal case, the elements of passing off seem to have been made out – Ali G most certainly has a reputation and a misrepresentation was made. Such an action that suppresses the use of look-alikes could go part of the way towards establishing a de facto personality right for celebrities.
Ali G impersonators here
Pass yourself off as Ali G here and here
Pass your cat off as Ali G here
CARNIVAL TIME
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Sunday, December 07, 2003
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html