KAZAA NOT LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT SAYS DUTCH SUPREME COURT

Findlaw reports that the Dutch Supreme Court has ruled that the makers of Kazaa, the file-sharing program, cannot be held liable for copyright infringement regarding music, films and other files that are swapped on its network. The action was brought by Buma/Stemra, which protects the interests of the Dutch music industry and had demanded that Kazaa either close down or be forced to pay $124,000 for every day that it operated. According to Australian IT, Buma Sterma has now intimated that it may now go after consumers instead, as part of its attempts to crack down of file-sharing.

The IPKat would be upset if, following this decision, the Dutch music industry chose to target individual file sharers. So far action against individuals has been limited to the US. While file sharing is clearly copyright infringement, there was a time when the general belief was that that copyright would never be enforced. However, this is not the case anymore and few people can be ignorant of the music industry’s intention to enforce its rights. Present-day file sharers are perhaps somewhat less deserving of the our sympathy. Nonetheless, if the Dutch music industry does take action against individual file sharers, it can expect a great deal of negative publicity.

Learn to share here, here and here



KAZAA NOT LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT SAYS DUTCH SUPREME COURT KAZAA NOT LIABLE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT SAYS DUTCH SUPREME COURT Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, December 22, 2003 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.