Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / GENERIC MARKS POSER

GENERIC MARKS POSER

The IPKat would like to draw your attention to an interesting problem posed in the INTA Trademark [sic!] List. The issue is basically whether a mark owner can make his own trade mark generic in order to block others from registering it.

The IPKat says keep an eye out for answers to this one, which are already trickling in on the List.
GENERIC MARKS POSER GENERIC MARKS POSER Reviewed by Anonymous on Friday, October 22, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. JeremyFriday, 22 October 2004 at 10:59:00 GMT+1

    This question has some interesting corollaries. For example, if I use a word generically but, (i) despite my best efforts to do so, the public persists in using it as a trade mark , and (ii) no use is made of it by other traders, the word would be registrable by him since Council Directive 89/104, Articles 2 and 3, would not appear to exclude me from subsequently registering it -- but no competitor could register it because it not not distinguish his goods/services. If however the public persists in understanding the word I use as a generic term as though it were a competitor's trade mark, my use would not presumably bar that word from registration by my competitor.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.