Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / TW OCTOBER 2004

TW OCTOBER 2004

-

The October 2004 issue of Informa's ten-time-a-year Trademark World leads with a feature by B. Brett Heavner and Naresh Kilaru (Finnegan Henderson) on the Idaho Potato Commission case, a US dispute involving the doctrine of licensee estoppel and its applicability where the mark licensed is a certification mark rather than just an ordinary trade mark. Other pieces of interest include

* "Extracting Value" by Michael Stirling (Field Fisher Waterhouse), on the rise of trade marks as a key financial indicator of the value of a company;

* "The Razor's Edge" by Bardehle Pagenberg's Claus Eckhartt - a review of the international litigation in Philips v Remgington over the three-headed shaver configuration and its defining role in the European law on shape marks;

* "Pitfalls of Tomorrow" by Lisa Rovinsky and Kathleen Heberlein (Alston & Bird) on the currently sexy topic of online advertising practice versus trade mark rights.
TW OCTOBER 2004 TW OCTOBER 2004 Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, October 10, 2004 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousFriday, 4 November 2005 at 14:47:00 GMT

    a lot of premium products and services being offered for free. What’s best is that there is a seemingly

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.