YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE DEAD TO WORK HERE -- BUT IT HELPS


The BBC reports that Elvis Presley has topped the list of highest-earning dead celebrities with an annual income of $40 million. This revenue comes not only from copyright royalties, but also from merchandising activities. The full list, compiled by Forbes.com is as follows:

1. Elvis Presley $40m (£22m) 2. Charles Schulz $35m (£19m) 3. JRR Tolkien $23m (£12.5m) 4. John Lennon $21m (£11m) 5. Theodor "Dr. Seuss" Geisel $18m (£10m) 6. Marilyn Monroe $8m (£4.3m) 7. George Harrison $7m (£3.8m) =7. Irving Berlin $7m =7. Bob Marley $7m 10. Richard Rodgers $6.5m 11. George and Ira Gershwin $6m =11. Jimi Hendrix $6m =11. Alan Jay Lerner and Frederick Loewe $6m =11. Cole Porter $6m 15. James Dean $5m (£2.7m) =15. Dale Earnhardt Sr $5m =15. Jerry Garcia $5m =15. Freddie Mercury $5m =15. Tupac Shakur $5m =15. Frank Sinatra $5m

Though most celebrities’ earning power falls dramatically after their deaths, for a select few it keeps on growing according to a Forbes spokesman.

The IPKat says that this goes to show that while everyone must die eventually, even the rich and famous, the value of a good IP portfolio is immortal.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE DEAD TO WORK HERE -- BUT IT HELPS YOU DON'T HAVE TO BE DEAD TO WORK HERE -- BUT IT HELPS Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 26, 2004 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. Whoa, hold on a minute. Who says Elvis is DEAD, for heaven's sake?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I discuss this topic daily myself. I also have a website that talks about business home home internet make money online.free related things. Go check it out if you get a chance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. with no damage to your business’ budget whatsoever.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.