According to the publisher's website, this book
"... provides the most rigorous analysis available of legislation and case law on copyright and related rights. Covering copyright, moral rights, rights in performances and rights in unregistered design and provides the last word on all these areas of law".The IPKat doubts that the bit about it being the last word is true, partly because we keep having more cases to digest and partly because no-one else would dare to take the last word for as long as Lord Justice Jacob is its distinguished custodian in the Court of Appeal.
The editorial triumvirate has done a great job. Curiously, for a team editing a major copyright work, two of the three have been more than a little touched by patents: Kevin Garnett QC has now gone to the European Patent Office in Munich while Gillian Davies has not so long returned from that very institution. Only Gwilym Harbottle appears to have resisted the lure of the patent monopoly, basing himself in the tranquil surroundings of Lincoln's Inn.
There's a bright new section on design protection and a slightly surprisingly one on goodwill and passing-off -- subjects that have been gracefully lifted from the discipline of trade mark law and given a copyright spin of their own. The IPKat particularly likes the section on relief and remedies, which deals with pan-IP principles as well as copyright's well-known peculiarities. What the IPKat isn't too sure of, though, is how this work covers the important topic of DRM, which has so far left little trace in terms of case law but which hovers over copyright like Banquo's ghost at Macbeth's feast. There isn't a special section on it, although it's odds-on that the new section dedicated to DRM in the 16th edition will be one of its strongest selling points.
More on Walter Copinger here
COPINGER AND SKONE JAMES: THE LATEST INSTALMENT
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, June 16, 2005
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html