The IPKat’s initial response to this comment was incredulity, but thinking about it a bit more carefully, the IPKat notes that the rate sought for these trade secrets was $1.5m. A theft of similarity valued tangible property would most likely attract similar condemnation and a similar sentence.
The IPKat’s initial response to this comment was incredulity, but thinking about it a bit more carefully, the IPKat notes that the rate sought for these trade secrets was $1.5m. A theft of similarity valued tangible property would most likely attract similar condemnation and a similar sentence.
...but your average woman on the street should be pretty familiar with the idea that stealing $1.5m of tangible assets could land her up in jail ... are intellectual property crimes as widely understood? Ignorance may be no excuse, but to expect equal punish seems somewhat arbitrary.
ReplyDelete