Google to face jury trial

eWeek reports that Google is to face a jury trial in a case brought against it by American Blind & Wallpaper Inc in San Francisco. The case concerns Google’s Adwords scheme, whereby trade marks were sold to their owners’ competitors as advertising keywords. This is said to be the first jury trial of an internet keyword issue.

The IPKat is not feeling optimistic – it’s hard enough for judges to get their heads around (a) the technology and (b) the tricky issue of trade mark use, let alone a jury.
Google to face jury trial Google to face jury trial Reviewed by Anonymous on Monday, May 14, 2007 Rating: 5


  1. Why should a judge want to get his/her head around a jury?

  2. When Google loses this or an upcoming trademark lawsuit, they will be impacted, but still very profitable. The majority of Adwords revenue comes from advertising on generic phrases like “window blinds” versus trademarks like “American Blind.”

    Incidentally, some companies decide not to implement the current trademark policy because they may not have a vested interest in a reseller market, this choice should continue to be left to the trademark holder. The auto industry is a good example, and Ford does not implement the trademark policy on the trademarked phrase “used Ford F150″ because they encourage dealerships and aggregators to handle the used vehicle market.

    ...frequently asked questions about the Google Lawsuit


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.