From the IPKat's spare set of US eyes a.k.a. Miri Frankel comes this link to a piece by Rocco Parascandolo on a fascinating trade mark infringement action in which Orlando, Florida-based pizza chain NYPD Pizza is accused of "intentionally and purposefully" making its logo look like the New York Police Department's shield and decorating its pizzerias to resemble police precincts, complete with bills that look like summonses. The pizza chain denies infringement, saying this is a tribute to a department held in high esteem by its owner. Said a lawyer for the pizza company:
Sign up for the defendant's pizza franchise here
Pizza recipes here and here
Pizza deprivation here
Pizza addiction here
Pizza art here
"We think the consumers are sophisticated enough to know the Police Department is not involved in running pizzerias".That may be so, but the police department, through the Police Foundation, licenses use of its intellectual property to raise money, 10 percent of which is retained by the city of New York itself. Consumer confusion is not the issue, says the IPKat, if the pizza is a dilutionary one. Merpel wonders how much goodwill exists in law-enforcement icons in Orlando, which has recently attracted attention as a growth-centre for crime (see here and here).
Sign up for the defendant's pizza franchise here
Pizza recipes here and here
Pizza deprivation here
Pizza addiction here
Pizza art here
Looking for a 'pizza' the action
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, June 11, 2007
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html