The seven discussion papers published in this issue are:
The IPKat has managed to procure a few spare copies, which he's happy to send out to the first few people who write in to request them. Please email him here and he'll let you know if you're one of the lucky few -- but remember, he can only send it if you've got a terrestrial address and a letter box ...* "Innovation goes public", by Bruce Perens, a powerful speaker, a naturally creative thinker and a man who is so synonymous with the open source movement that he has all but trade marked it;
* "Origins and development of open source and GPL licensing" by Heather Meeker, a GT attorney and IP licensing academic who has a background in computer programming;
* "Key intellectual property issues in acquisitions involving open source software" by Jim Markwith -- open source software licensing counsel at Microsoft, who previously worked with Adobe. Jim also lectures at the Santa Clara University;
* "M&A, joint ventures and IPOs" by Nigel Swycher (Olswang's Open Source Unit), who masterminded the Summit;* "Source code assessment in due diligence" by Kat McCabe (General Counsel, Black Duck Software: the IPKat is well-disposed to everyone called Kat, and this Kat has a great deal of practical and legal insight to commend her);
* "Commercial licensing models" by Jan Wildeboer (Solution Architect at Red Hat and a well known enemy of software patents);
"Open source in the mobile world" by David Wood (Executive Vice-President of Research, Symbian, and an author and commentator on software issues).
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html