The Lawyer reported yesterday that legal chiefs at some of the UK's leading brand-owning businesses convened a crisis meeting last week to look at the legality of Google's revamped keywords policy which, they believe, infringes their trade marks. Those involved are said to include the Arcadia Group (Topshop and Dorothy Perkins), Lastminute.com, Saga and the Association of British Travel Agents. Google is reported as saying that it had conducted a full legal and business review in the UK and Ireland before implementing the policy and that it was confident of its legal position.The IPKat doubts that this matter will ever go to court. The magnitude of the issues at stake, the length of time it will take to resolve given the likelihood of appeals, the risk of one or more references for preliminary rulings by the European Court of Justice and the dependence of the brand-owning protagonists on Google for the promotion of their own goods and services all militate in favour of a settlement. Merpel says, what about the prospect of Europe-only legislation? Might that not encourage Google to go for a settlement too? [The Kat thanks his friend Lawrence Ryz for the link].
Dorothy Perkins here
Polly Perkins here
Purrkins here
Will Dorothy Perkins go to war?
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Rating:
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html