Those images of trade marks that refuse to be shown on the Curia website (see earlier post here) are still rankling with the IPKat. The results of the snap (40 hour) poll of readers indicated that, of 128 respondents, 126 stated that they were unable to view either of the images which the Court of First Instance was comparing in Case T-307/08 Aldi Einkauf v OHIM. The Kat has subsequently written a message to the Curia's innominate contact (the contact details are here). The message reads as follows:
STOP PRESS: Curia server still down at 8.16pm, but the message went through at 8.26pm.
"To whom it may concern
Dear Curia
I write on behalf of members of the community of trade mark proprietors, practitioners, academics and students who regularly access judgments on the Curia website on appeals relating to Community trade marks.
Having accessed Case T-307/08 Aldi Einkauf v OHIM I discovered, not for the first time, that neither of the images which the court sought to compare were accessible to me. I subsequently conducted a poll of readers of the IPKat weblog (www.ipkat.com) which indicated that, of 128 readers who visited Case T-307/08, 126 reported that they could not access any images.
I write to request that appropriate measures be taken to rectify the position as swiftly as possible and to post the relevant graphic images in a manner in which they can be viewed by a readership that includes Judges, Trade Mark Registry administrators and hearing officers, trade mark attorneys, regular attorneys and commercial decision-makers.
Yours sincerely
The IPKat".Alas, the story doesn't get much better at this point. The IPKat has made eight attempts to post this message so far, but all he gets is this notice, which says
The EUROPA server is temporarily unavailablein no fewer than 23 languages.We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause you
STOP PRESS: Curia server still down at 8.16pm, but the message went through at 8.26pm.
O servidor, O mores -- still no joy over Curia's invisible images
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, October 22, 2009
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html