The next "must-have" accessory: competition

The second of this week's two IPKat competitions (the first is here) relates to the forthcoming annual conference, Intellectual Property in the Fashion Industry: Handbags at dawn! This enjoyable event, held in Central London on Tuesday 21 September, is chaired by IPKat team blogger Jeremy, who will be responsible for keeping order while a lively bundle of speakers provides news, views, advice and sage counsel on the state of play for IP in the fashion sector.

Right: when Tibbles got it home and took it out of the box, he was most annoyed to discover that it clashed with his natural fur colours ...

The rules of the competition are simple. You have been asked to nominate next year's "must-have" accessory for the smart and savvy intellectual property lawyer (male or female). What's needed is something that makes him/her look highly professional, dead effective and ultra-cool. Tell us what it is -- and why -- and can win the prize: complimentary admission to this exciting and thoroughly enjoyable event (plus a delicious lunch). To enter the competition, email the IPKat here, with the subject line "Accessory". Closing date is close of play on Sunday 5 September, so you'd better get your fashion brains working.

You can peruse the Handbags at Dawn programme here.
The next "must-have" accessory: competition The next "must-have" accessory: competition Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, August 12, 2010 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.