Is Jack the new Paul?

Readers may recall the meteoric rise to fame and subsequent tragic death of Paul the octopus, the much-vaunted predictor of the outcome World Cup football matches (you can read his obituary here).  A natural celebrity, Paul was the subject of numerous trade mark applications which were filed to protect his name and image.

Paul, it seems, now has a possible successor, Jack.  This Newcastle-based monkey has so far predicted correctly the outcome of the first two cricket test matches between deadly rivals England and Australia in the Ashes series.  His technique is based on the selection of a banana from one of two food bowls, one of which is designated 'England', the other 'Australia'.  Jack does not make his choices lightly and has been known to vacillate between the two bowls in a state of clear uncertainty before opting for one or other of them.

So far, says the IPKat, it does not appear as though the Intellectual Property Office has been flooded with speculative applications to register Jack or his likeness as a trade mark.  Merpel says, anyone can predict the outcome of sporting events; if this little chap is going to be of any value, let him try predicting the English weather ...

Further commentary on this outstanding creature and on the mathematics of sports event prediction can be heard on the BBC Radio 4  programme "More or Less" (here).
Jack turns his hand to football predictions here
Is Jack the new Paul? Is Jack the new Paul? Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, December 17, 2010 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. I suspect some readers may remember Joey the budgie, in "Carry On at Your Convenience". This bird tweeted as the character playeed by Sid James read the horse races and enabled him to make a fortune.

    From the rediculous to the submlime, the basic concept also appears in a short story by D.H.Lawrence.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.