Sorry about the shorter-than-average whimsies this morning, pants a desperate Kat who is racing to catch a flight. If all goes well, he hopes to add a few more bits and pieces before the day is out. Meanwhile ...
The Directors Roundtable Institute's breakfast jamboree on 4 April, “A Dialogue with David Kappos, Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office” (noted here by Matt the Kat) was a great success in proving that large numbers of English IP enthusiasts and practitioners can make it to Central London for an early Monday morning start, regardless of what they might have been doing the night before. Apart from that, there was also the question of its serious content. There's good news, says the IPKat, for those who were unable to attend, or who were still celebrating Sunday night when Monday morning came around: the transcript has been lovingly prepared, no expense spared, by a crack team of transcribers and has been posted on the Directors Roundtable webbie for your delectation, here.
Not yet available, but definitely promised by hosts Olswang LLP, is a link to yesterday's third SPC Blog seminar on supplementary protection certificates for patent term extension. A capacity crowd of 109 enjoyed the cut-and-thrust as speakers from Olswang, Rouse, Grau & Angulo and Carpmaels & Ransford addressed a number of sensitive topics and representatives of five intellectual property offices from around Europe narrow missed being impaled by some deadly questions. Alas, nearly half as many people again had to be turned away, since interest in attending was greater than the capacity of the room to accommodate everyone. The Kat, who also contributes to The SPC Blog, will let everyone know as soon as the promised link appears, so that those who couldn't attend will at least know what they missed.
After a slow start, the IPKat's poll on ICANN's forthcoming amplified gTLD regime (on which, see earlier post here) is gaining momentum. Please cast your vote: your opinions are always valuable to us, even if we don't pay you for them ...
After a fast start, registrations continue to rise for the 1709 Blog's copyright debate, on whether we come to praise copyright or to bury it. With nearly three weeks still to go, this event -- which is being held in conjunction with this weblog, now has a remarkable 182 people signed up, making it the biggest free event yet organised by the Kat and his friends. If you've not yet signed up, click here for details.
The Roundtable was great, but it was generally agreed that Continental breakfast just isn't the same without coffee ... |
There wasn't room for everyone: maybe a bigger venue next year? |
After a slow start, the IPKat's poll on ICANN's forthcoming amplified gTLD regime (on which, see earlier post here) is gaining momentum. Please cast your vote: your opinions are always valuable to us, even if we don't pay you for them ...
After a fast start, registrations continue to rise for the 1709 Blog's copyright debate, on whether we come to praise copyright or to bury it. With nearly three weeks still to go, this event -- which is being held in conjunction with this weblog, now has a remarkable 182 people signed up, making it the biggest free event yet organised by the Kat and his friends. If you've not yet signed up, click here for details.
Wednesday whimsies
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, June 22, 2011
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html