Lord Atkin: once a judge, now a Building |
Yesterday's IPKat event, kindly hosted by London law firm RPC, was the double-header on why bad things happen to bad IP licences -- and even good ones. The venue is situated in St Katharine's Dock (left), a coveted location for those lawyers who travel to work by yacht and need somewhere wet to park. This Kat enjoyed himself and has reasonable grounds on which to believe that he was not alone. You can now access the PowerPoints from Paul Joseph (Senior associate, RPC, speaking on licences, here) and from Neil J. Wilkof (Of counsel, Dr Eyal Bressler & Co, speaking on sublicences, here).
The IPKat's friends at Premier Cercle are getting all excited about their IP Week & Open Innovation 2011 conference, which takes place in Brussels, at the Hotel Crowne Plaza Le Palace, from 6 to 9 December (details here). IPKat readers who register to attend this conference are entitled to a 30% discount on their registration rate so long as they fill the “Promotional Code” box in the registration form with the word “IPKat”. This entitles them to the untold delights of a bottom-rock price of 666 euros for the four days of conference (instead of 999 euros), as well as the chance to rub shoulders with cast of famous IP personalities including Francis Gurry (Director General of WIPO), David Kappos (Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of USPTO), Wallace & Gromit, Elvis Presley ...
Wednesday whimsies
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html