New 'simple coffe' menu (from eater.com) |
"The new-look drinks menu which [has been launched on 29 October last and] describes coffee in simple terms has been created in direct response to customer feedback that revealed over 70% of coffee drinkers have experienced ‘coffee confusion’ in cafes, bars and restaurants."
The hot beverage warning never discourages Merpel |
What must be remembered is the tremendous contribution modern names for coffee have made to our culture. The famous coffee ordering scene from Steve Martin's LA Story being a great example(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-CrML0BzOA)
ReplyDeleteI'm fascinated by the fact that cappuccinos and lattes taste very different in different stores. Mochas are even more diverse being anywhere between a coffee and a hot chocolate, and the world of mochaccinos and flavoured syrups opens up vast universes of exploration.
One person's 'confusion' is another person's 'enigma' I suppose, and if the customers of Debenhams don't want to experience escapist fantasies of being in the cast of Friends through their coffees, then Debenhams should respond to that.
Never mind cappuccino/frothy coffee, I regret the complexity of modern coffee shops not because it causes me confusion (either espresso or caffe lungo, thanks) but because I'm invariably stuck behind someone whose life will be ruined unless they've very carefully thought about their choice of beverage, animal or vegetable whitener, its fat content, flavourings, toppings, portability and don't get me started about the choice of muffins.
ReplyDeleteUK customers get confused by exotic terms such as 'espresso', and 'cappucino'? My flabber is offically gasted.
ReplyDeleteWhy, yes, I am a coffee snob. Why does one ask?
I'm reminded of a scene in A Hand-book of Volapük (a novel about inventors of artificial languages) in which two characters are delighting in mellifluous terms for wine bottles - jeroboams, etc. - whilst a third is bemoaning the haphazard irregularity of natural languages. Wherever there is colour in a language there will be someone urging its eradication.
ReplyDeleteYou're paying A$3.50 for a department store cappuccino (sorry… 'frothy coffee')?!
ReplyDeleteI don't think the biggest issue here is what they choose to call it.
I have to say that if I saw the sign, I'd assume that the reason for the wording was some sort of trademark difficulty. Whereas this time it seems that IP is, for once, entirely innocent!
ReplyDeleteIf the idea is simply to make it clear which drink is which, it seems a little odd not to have the "official" name there at all - if I were redesigning it I'd be tempted to include "cappucino" and the like after each name, in a smaller font and in brackets.