Retail therapy may be fun for some -- but there are lots of legal issues to address too |
In need of re-tail therapy? |
Brand value is at the heart of every retail business, no matter what or how it sells. The importance of creating and protecting a strong and identifiable brand in a competitive market and difficult economic conditions is paramount and can be key to the survival of smaller or start-up businesses. As markets become increasingly international, retailers face the additional challenges of protecting their brands across jurisdictions and ensuring consistency. This conference ... examines key issues surrounding the creation, use and protection of brands in the retail sector. It will be valuable for lawyers advising both start-up and established retailers of all types and sizes from online boutiques to major high street names. The key topics to be covered include:
This weblog is represented among the all-star cast of speakers, since blogmeister Jeremy and guest Kat Robert Cumming are both on the programme -- Jeremy in the chair and Robert doing some of the hard work. Other speakers, in alphabetical order, are Mark Abell (Field Fisher Waterhouse), Alex Carter-Silk (Speechly Bircham), Abida Chaudri (Baker & MacKenzie), Rebecca Chong (Institute of Practitioners in Advertising) and Chrfistopher Stothers (Arnold & Porter).
- Protection of shop names and trade dress
- Retailers going online
- Developing a successful business model into a franchising format
- Use of third party brand names in advertisements and marketing material
- Cross-Border Sales - Issues involving grey goods
- Development of own-brand products: Economic and legal Issues
If you want to join us on the big day, registration details are here. If not, Jeremy is hoping to do a spot of real-time speed-blogging so that you will have at least an inkling of what you're missing.
IP and retailers: a new event
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Tuesday, December 04, 2012
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html