Best Practices in IP 2013: conference reports 4, 5 and 6

The afternoon sessions of today's conference on "Best Practices in Intellectual Property 2013: International Perspectives on Creating and Extracting Value", were focused on monetisation and enforcement issues and this Kat thought it best to post them on IP Finance (here and here) and PatLit (here).
Best Practices in IP 2013: conference reports 4, 5 and 6 Best Practices in IP 2013: conference reports 4, 5 and 6 Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.