Do you really LOVE copyright? A Katcontest for younger copyright enthusiasts

Copyright lover and poet?
This competition is for you!
This Kat will be speaking at the forthcoming Copyright and Technology Conference, that will be held in London on 17 October 2013.

The organisers have just informed her that she can invite one lucky person to attend the conference for free, instead of having to pay the £249 registration fee. 

Mindful of the fact that younger copyright enthusiasts with limited financial support from their own organisations might find ... let's just say "challenging" to attend these sorts of events, this Kat has decided to donate her own complimentary ticket to the creative soul who will complete the following stanza in the most original (not just for the sake of copyright protection!) and amusing (at least according to peculiarly feline sense of humour) way:

Roses are red,
Violets are blue,
Copyright is ...

This is not the only good news. Fellow speaker Emma Linklater, a talented PhD researcher at this Kat's former institution (the European University Institute) has also agreed to donate her own complimentary ticket.

This means that two lucky copyright enthusiasts will be able to attend this great event.

The only requirement to enter the Katcontest is to be under 33 years old (this means that oldest entrants were born in 1980).

Entries must be submitted by Thursday 3 October 11 pm GMT (tomorrow) to the following email address: copyrightkatcontest@gmail.com

The IPKat will publish the best entries, so do please also provide an irrevocable gratuitous and non-exclusive licence when submitting your original work. 


Good luck! 
Do you really LOVE copyright? A Katcontest for younger copyright enthusiasts Do you really LOVE copyright? A Katcontest for younger copyright enthusiasts Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Wednesday, October 02, 2013 Rating: 5

12 comments:

  1. Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    Copyright's dead
    Via digital coup

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't think I count as "young" any more, so don't really qualify for the competition. I couldn't resist the chance to submit this one, though:

    Roses are red,
    Violets are blue,
    Copyright is not limited to works that rhyme and scan properly,
    Such as this one.

    :o)

    ReplyDelete

  3. Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    Copyright is king
    Vanilla Ice knows it too

    ReplyDelete
  4. I say:-

    Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    Copyright is something that you can overdo

    The benefit to society
    defies all propriety

    Can't it be replaced with something anew?

    Ashley

    PS Eleonora, you know that I am a little to old to qualify but I thought that I'd play anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    I invented something
    Also-rans: "Me too, me too"

    (not eligible for the contest, but wanted to plug a critical difference between copyright and patents in that patent infringement is a strict liability with no independent creation defense - for a reason)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    Copyright seems to rhyme with fight

    ReplyDelete
  7. Roses are red,
    Violets are blue
    Copyright is FUN
    It's honestly true!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Christina M at 22:03:00 BST inspired me to write the last line:

    Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    Copyright seems to rhyme with fight
    What one creates two hundred sue

    ReplyDelete
  9. Roses are red
    Violets are blue
    I own the rights to that poem
    Take down this thread

    (no, I don't own the rights, but someone might, and is this not clearly a derivative work(s) that impinges on the copyright of that creator?)

    ReplyDelete
  10. @ Anonymous 12:53: Could well be, but Wikipedia tells me that the origins of the poem trace back to Edmund Spenser (1590) ...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Eleonora.

    It appears that Mr. Spenser did not have the same connections that a certain rodent has...

    ;-)

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.