The Kats' credo ... |
Crowds aren't always educationally advantageous |
Whatever happened to Astellas? This is the question which the IPKat posed last Friday, on learning that Case C-661/13 Astellas Pharma Inc. v Polpharma SA Pharmaceutical Works, a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of some questions relating to the so-called Bolar exemption, which spares some sorts of use of someone else's patent for experimental purposes from being a patent infringement. Via Katfriend and occasional contributor Paul England (Taylor Wessing) we have now heard the fate of that case from his colleague Anja Lunze (katpat!). Says Anja:
"According to Christoph de Coster (TaylorWessing Germany, Munich) who handled the case for Polpharma, Astellas waived all claims still pending before the Düsseldorf Appeal Court. Accordingly the Düsseldorf Appeal Court accepted the appeal and overruled the Düsseldorf District Court decisions as far as appealed. As a consequence, the Düsseldorf Appeal Court withdrew the questions referred to the CJEU (since they were no longer relevant for the decision of the case) and the matter was removed from the register by the CJEU".Thanks, guys!
CISAC congratulations. This Kat notes with pleasure that Gadi Oron has been appointed Director General of the International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), based in Paris. He recalls Gadi from Queen Mary College days as a sweet, polite and always diplomatic student, someone with whom it's always worth having a chat and a coffee. Good luck, Gadi, in your new role.
Around the weblogs. The World Trademark Review's blog caught the Kat's eye earlier this week with news that President Barack Obama has taken time off from his golfing commitments to nominate a new IP czar (technically "Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator"), Kilpatrick Townsend's Daniel Marti, though Merpel thinks he got back to the links in time to avoid choosing a new Director for the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The 1709 Blog carries the results of the black-crested macaque selfie sidebar poll, which turned out to less exciting than some of us had hoped, on account of so many people agreeing that no copyright existed at all in works created by animals [this Kat wonders whether this might be another nail in the much-cited dictum of Petersen J in University of London Press Limited v University Tutorial Press Ltd [1916] 2 Ch. 601 that "what is worth copying is prima facie worth protecting"]. Finally, SOLO IP reports that, for every 100 jobs in the legal services sector, 67 jobs are created outside the legal service sector -- so whose jobs are we creating?
Next month the IP Factor, Israeli patent attorney Michael Factor's always interesting and sometimes highly outspoken weblog, celebrates its 10th birthday. This Kat will be speaking at the event, in an unusual-sounding venue, Cinema City, Ramot HaSharon, Israel. The event is billed as a PCTea-Party and this Kat's talk, on protecting and exploiting IP, inspired by the book of Ecclesiastes, is entitled "A time to sow and a time to reap". If you are in the area, do drop in: the kettle will be bubbling away. Click here for registration details.
Thursday thingies
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Thursday, September 04, 2014
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html